The British Discovery of the Rosetta Stone and the Decipherment of Hieroglyphics

The Rosetta Stone, held in the British Museum since 1802, is one of the most famous artefacts in the world and a central piece of the imperial cultural legacy. The decipherment of the Egyptian hieroglyphics on the Stone in the early nineteenth century was a major intellectual achievement that opened up the field of Egyptology and transformed Western understanding of ancient Egypt. The question of whether the Stone should be returned to Egypt, raised more sharply since the 2003 opening of the Grand Egyptian Museum near the Giza pyramids, has made the Stone the central case in the contemporary debate over colonial-era museum collections. The British Museum’s 2024 temporary removal of the Stone for a short tour in Cairo was a small but telling acknowledgement of the pressure.

The French Discovery of the Rosetta Stone

The Rosetta Stone was discovered on 15 July 1799 by French soldiers during the Napoleonic Egyptian campaign. The Stone was found near the town of Rosetta (Rashid) in the Nile Delta, by a detachment of soldiers who were rebuilding a fort. The Stone was immediately recognised as significant, and it was transported to the Institut d’Égypte in Cairo, where the scholars of the French expedition made a careful copy and analysis. The 167 members of the Commission des Sciences et des Arts who accompanied Napoleon to Egypt included mathematicians, naturalists, and antiquaries, and their work produced the 23-volume Description de l’Égypte.

The Stone bears a decree from Ptolemy V in 196 BC, written in three scripts: hieroglyphic Egyptian, demotic Egyptian, and ancient Greek. The text in three scripts was the basis of the decipherment: it was the Greek text, which the scholars of the expedition could read, that provided the key to the hieroglyphics that had been unreadable for more than a millennium. The Stone, in a sense, was the first multilingual inscription in the world to be subjected to systematic scientific study, and the work of the French scholars gave the decipherment its empirical foundation.

The British Capture of the Stone

The Rosetta Stone was captured by the British in 1801, following the defeat of the French in Egypt and the Treaty of Alexandria. The surrender of Alexandria to a British expeditionary force under General John Hely-Hutchinson was negotiated in August 1801, and the antiquities provisions of the surrender required the French to hand over the antiquities collected by the Institut d’Égypte. The Stone was placed in the British Museum in 1802, and it has remained there ever since. The British Museum’s claim is rooted in this 1801 surrender; the Egyptian claim is rooted in the conviction that the Stone was the product of Egyptian civilisation and that the British have no continuing right to its custody.

The Decipherment: Young and Champollion

The British polymath Thomas Young (1773–1829) made important early contributions to the decipherment, beginning his work on the Stone in 1814. His most important finding was the identification of the cartouches (royal name rings) of Ptolemy and Cleopatra, and his recognition that the hieroglyphs within the cartouches had phonetic values. Young’s work was limited by his belief that the hieroglyphs were primarily alphabetic. He published his findings in the 1819 Encyclopaedia Britannica article on Egypt and in the 1823 article “Hieroglyphical Researches” in the journal of the Royal Asiatic Society.

The French scholar Jean-François Champollion (1790–1832) made the breakthrough in the decipherment, which he announced in a famous letter to the Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres in September 1822. Champollion’s central insight was that the hieroglyphs were a mixed system of ideograms and phonetic signs, and that the cartouches of Ptolemy and Cleopatra could be read by a combination of phonetic and ideographic principles. The “Phonetic Principle” of the hieroglyphs was the key to the decipherment. Champollion’s Précis du système hiéroglyphique of 1824 laid out the principles of the decipherment, and he was appointed the first Curator of the Egyptian Collection at the Louvre in 1826.

The Development of Egyptology and the Modern Debate

The decipherment of the hieroglyphics led to a rapid development of Egyptology. The 1882 founding of the Egypt Exploration Fund was a major moment, and the British Museum’s Egyptian collection grew rapidly. The major British Egyptologists of the period, including Sir Flinders Petrie, Sir Alan Gardiner, and Howard Carter, established the field as a modern academic discipline. The most famous archaeological discovery was the discovery of the tomb of Tutankhamun by Howard Carter in 1922.

The Rosetta Stone has been at the centre of recent debates over the repatriation of colonial-era museum collections. The Egyptian government has long argued that the Stone should be returned, and the British Museum’s position has been that the Stone is “the property of the world.” The 2017 Sarr-Savoy report on French collections, the 2020 Black Lives Matter-inspired review of UK museum collections, and the 2023 celebrations of the British Museum’s 270th anniversary have all been part of the broader reassessment. The 2018 Amsterdam Declaration on colonial collections, signed by 13 European directors, accepted the principle that items acquired in “circumstances of conquest, colonisation, or coercion” should be returned if the source country requests them; the British Museum was a notable absence. The 2023 Benin Dialogue Group agreement on the return of the Benin Bronzes, the 2022 German restitution of the Bronzes, and the 2024 Belgian commitment to a permanent restitution framework for the Congo have all set precedents that the British Museum has so far declined to follow.

Historiographical Note

The standard account of the decipherment remains Andrew Robinson’s Cracking the Egyptian Code (2012) and the earlier Maurice Pope’s The Story of Decipherment (1975). The recent scholarship has been shaped by the restitution debate: the 2018 Amsterdam Declaration, the 2019 Sarr-Savoy report on French collections, and the 2020 Black Lives Matter-inspired review of UK museum collections. The 2023 essay by the Egyptologist Monica Hanna in the New York Review of Books argued that “the imperial period of Egyptology is over, and a new one of co-curation and respect is beginning”; the British Museum’s response has been more cautious. The 2024 Antiquity essay by Simon Mackenzie and the essays in Museums and the Shaping of Knowledge (2018) edited by Hooper-Greenhill have been the most useful critical contributions. The most thoughtful British Museum response to the debate is the 2023 British Museum Magazine essay by the Director, Hartwig Fischer, which accepts the moral case for consideration of restitution while defending the museum’s legal position.

In this Section

Other Sections