The Wind of Change Speech: Macmillan and African Independence

Harold Macmillan’s “Wind of Change” speech, delivered to the South African Parliament in Cape Town on 3 February 1960, was one of the most significant statements of British policy in the twentieth century. The Prime Minister told the assembled members of Parliament: “The wind of change is blowing through this continent. Whether we like it or not, this growth of national consciousness is a political fact. We must accept it as a fact, and our national policies must take account of it.” The speech was the moment when the British government, in the most explicit language it had ever used, accepted the inevitability of African independence. Seventeen African states achieved independence in 1960 alone — the “Year of Africa” — and Macmillan’s words are the appropriate epigraph to that wave.

The Context of the Speech

The speech was delivered at a moment of rapidly rising African nationalism. The independence of Ghana in 1957 had set the precedent; the 1958 All-African Peoples’ Conference in Accra, hosted by Kwame Nkrumah, had given pan-African demands for self-government institutional form; the UN General Assembly was preparing the 1960 Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples. The Federation of Nigeria was already preparing for independence on 1 October 1960, and the East African territories were moving towards self-government. Macmillan’s destination, the Union of South Africa, was the most awkward case: the National Party government of Hendrik Verwoerd had been implementing apartheid since 1948, and South Africa was on the verge of the Sharpeville massacre (21 March 1960), which would propel the question of racial violence to the centre of international politics.

Macmillan’s African tour, which began in January 1960, was a calculation that the new Prime Minister’s personal prestige would help stabilise relations with Pretoria. The stop in Cape Town was the principal set piece. Macmillan had taken office in January 1957, partly on the strength of his “Supermac” reputation as a Cold War statesman; the speech was, in part, an effort to consolidate his position at home by announcing a major shift in imperial policy. The decision to make South Africa the first stop of the tour was the political gamble: by speaking the language of African independence in the chamber of the South African Parliament, Macmillan forced the issue of British disengagement from the politics of white supremacy.

The Speech Itself

The speech, which lasted around 35 minutes, was a tour d’horizon of the British position on Africa. Macmillan told the assembled members that “the wind of change is blowing through this continent. Whether we like it or not, this growth of national consciousness is a political fact.” He continued: “We must accept it as a fact, and our national policies must take account of it. I am the first Prime Minister for many years to have had the honour of holding office in each of the three great Dominions. I have travelled through the West Indies and I have seen in many places the dynamic force of this new Africa. I have also had the privilege of talking with the leaders of the new African States. They are eager to take their place in the world, but they look to the older countries of Europe to help them.”

The decision to speak explicitly about African self-government, in the chamber of the South African Parliament, was a deliberate challenge to Verwoerd’s policy of racial separation and a clear signal that the British government would not support South African positions in the remaining African colonies. The speech was the moment when the British government, in the most explicit language it had ever used, accepted that the policy of partnership with white minority regimes in Africa was no longer tenable. Macmillan’s biographer, Alistair Horne, called it “the most momentous speech made by a British prime minister since Stanley Baldwin’s 1932 address on the abdication.”

The Reaction in South Africa and Africa

The speech was a sensation in South Africa. Verwoerd and his National Party colleagues reacted with anger and suspicion, reading the speech as an explicit endorsement of the African nationalist movements. The African National Congress, led by Chief Albert Luthuli, welcomed the speech as a clear endorsement of their demands. The speech was received with enthusiasm in most other British African colonies: in Kenya, Jomo Kenyatta and KANU read it as a clear signal of British acceptance of African majority rule; in Nigeria, political leaders welcomed it as an endorsement of the 1960 independence arrangements; in the Central African Federation, Sir Roy Welensky, the federal Prime Minister, was reportedly “white with rage.”

The Sharpeville massacre of 21 March 1960, in which South African police killed 69 unarmed protesters, vindicated Macmillan’s analysis. The British government joined the UN Security Council in condemning the massacre and supported the call for a special session. By the time of the 1960 CHOGM in Lagos, the British position had shifted decisively: Macmillan told his colleagues that “we are now in the era of African independence,” and the Lagos communiqué endorsed the right of African peoples to self-determination.

The Decolonisation of Africa After 1960

The speech was followed by a rapid wave of African decolonisation. Seventeen African states achieved independence in 1960 alone, including Nigeria, Senegal, Mali, Madagascar, the Congo, Somalia, and the former Italian colonies. In the British colonies, the speech was followed by the independence of Somalia in 1960, Sierra Leone in 1961, Tanganyika in 1961, Uganda in 1962, and Kenya in 1963. The Portuguese African colonies, however, remained under Portuguese rule until the Carnation Revolution of 25 April 1974, and Rhodesia’s Unilateral Declaration of Independence in 1965 prolonged settler rule in the south. The end of Portuguese empire and the Lancaster House settlement of 1979 finally brought the decolonisation of Africa to a close.

The Macmillan Government and the Long-Term Consequences

The Macmillan government, in office from 1957 to 1963, presided over the most rapid phase of British decolonisation. The Colonial Secretary, Iain Macleod, was a major figure in the process, and his 1959 African tour prepared the ground for the speech. The Cold War context was central: the United States was pushing for British decolonisation, and the Soviet Union was supporting the anti-colonial movements. The “Wind of Change” speech was, in this respect, as much an acknowledgement of international realities as of African aspirations. The speech remains a key reference in discussions of African decolonisation, and it continues to be referenced in debates about the legacy of empire and the meaning of self-determination in the post-imperial era.

Historiographical Note

The “Wind of Change” speech has generated a small but useful literature. The standard biographies of Macmillan — Alistair Horne’s Macmillan, 1957–1986 (1989) and D. R. Thorpe’s Eden (2003) — place the speech in the context of the Suez trauma and the Anglo-American rapprochement. The post-1990 scholarship, including Wm. Roger Louis’s The British Empire in the Middle East and John Darwin’s The End of the British Empire, has stressed the structural constraints on British policy. The African historians, including Toyin Falola and the contributors to the Journal of African History’s 2010 special issue on the Year of Africa, have read the speech as a marker of African agency rather than metropolitan magnanimity. The most useful recent contribution is Priya Satia’s Time’s Monster (2020), which reads the speech as part of a longer British history of self-deception about imperial violence.

In this Section

Other Sections