Cricket and the West Indies

The most consequential single work of cricket writing in the English language opens with a question, not an answer. C. L. R. James, the Trinidadian Marxist historian, began Beyond a Boundary (1963) with the line that has since passed into the sport’s common idiom: “What do they know of cricket who only cricket know?” James was not indulging in epigram. He was staking a claim. The book that followed was, as Jack Williams wrote in Cricket and Race (2001), “half memoir, half history, and half philosophy” — and the proportions were deliberate. West Indian cricket, James argued, had to be read as West Indian social history: it was the principal institutional form in which the British West Indies, a collection of small islands with no single capital, no integrated economy, and no common politics, could imagine itself as a people. The claim is no longer controversial; it is the starting point of every serious history of the game.

Hilary Beckles, in his work on the social history of West Indian cricket, has built directly on James. The argument is now common ground: cricket came to the West Indies with the British garrison and the British planter, but it was the West Indian, and especially the Afro-West Indian, who made the game his own. To treat West Indian cricket as a gift of empire is, on this view, to mistake the envelope for the letter.

The Nineteenth-Century Origins

The earliest recorded cricket in the West Indies was played by British soldiers and sailors. The Barbados Cricket Club, founded in 1832, was a planter-and-garrison body; the St Andrew Cricket Club in Jamaica followed in 1891; Trinidad’s earliest clubs dated from the 1840s. The first inter-colonial match, between Barbados and British Guiana, was played at the Garrison Savannah, Bridgetown, in 1860. The Barbados Cricket Association, founded in 1882, was the first West Indian governing body; the Trinidad Cricket Council followed in 1887.

Colour was written into the institutional structure from the start. The whites-only Barbados Cricket Club did not admit a non-white member until 1934, and the same exclusions operated, with local variations, in every West Indian territory. The result, as Jack Williams showed in Cricket and Race (2001), was the creation of a parallel coloured and black cricket infrastructure — the Maple Cricket Club in Trinidad, the Pickwick Cricket Club in Jamaica, the Progressive Youth Organisation in British Guiana — that was, in cultural terms, a different game. The black cricketer who reached the West Indian team of 1928 or 1930 had not entered the white clubs; he had bypassed them.

The 1900 Tour and the Imperial Frame

The 1900 tour of England was, by common consent, the first serious West Indian team. The side, captained by the Trinidadian lawyer C. A. P. Olivierre, played 17 first-class matches. They lost 14, drew 2, won 1 — and the winning record mattered less than the existence of the tour itself. A West Indian side was, in 1900, a thing that could only be assembled by treating the British West Indies as a single cricket nation, an act of administrative imagination that preceded the political imagination by half a century. The West Indies did not become a political federation until 1958; the West Indian cricket team was a federation from 1900.

The 1906 match against the MCC at Lord’s, drawn by the West Indian side led by the Bermudan all-rounder Llewellyn Howell, was the first sign that the imperial game was not entirely owned by the imperial side. The 1928 tour of England, captained by Learie Constantine, was the moment when the West Indian game acquired its modern identity. Constantine was, by then, the most famous cricketer in the Caribbean; his 1928 tour, as his biographer CLR James — and James was his friend, his biographer, and later his speechwriter at the Colonial Office — noted, “made the West Indian cricketer a person of consequence in England as well as in the West Indies.”

CLR James and the Politics of the Game

James’s Beyond a Boundary (1963) is the indispensable starting point. Its central chapter, on the 1933 Test match at Sabina Park, Kingston — the first West Indian victory over England in a Test match — is a sustained meditation on the West Indian social formation, on the function of the coloured middle class in the late colonial period, and on the cricket of the West Indian masses. The book also contains, at the centre, one of the finest pieces of cricket writing in the language: the account of Constant bowling at the English batsmen, and the West Indian crowd’s response.

“The battle was between Constantine and the English batsmen, and the West Indian crowd was in the middle of it, taking sides with passionate intensity. There was a heat, an electricity in the air. The West Indian crowd, which had been sullen and silent since the Englishmen came on the field, suddenly came to life, and Constantine became the symbol of their aspiration.”

That passage is, as Beckles and Williams have both observed, the moment at which cricket writing became West Indian history. James’s point was not that cricket was a substitute for politics. It was that the skills, the leadership, the audience, and the self-confidence that produced the West Indian cricketer were the same skills, leadership, audience, and self-confidence that produced the West Indian politician, the trade unionist, and the novelist.

The Post-Independence Period

The 1960s and 1970s were the great age of West Indian cricket. Garfield Sobers, whom many judges rate the finest all-round cricketer of the twentieth century, captained the side from 1965 to 1972. The 1975 Cricket World Cup, won under Clive Lloyd by beating Australia in the final at Lord’s, and the 1979 World Cup, won in the same fixture, were the moments at which the West Indian game became a global possession. The 1976 tour of England, in which the West Indian fast bowlers — Michael Holding, Andy Roberts, Joel Garner, Malcolm Marshall, Colin Croft — established a pace attack of unprecedented ferocity, was the sporting expression of a Black Power confidence that had its political analogue in the Grenadian Revolution and the rise of the Caribbean trade-union Left.

The collapse of the 1980s and 1990s is a separate story, and a contested one. The explanations offered range from the structural (the dissolution of the West Indies federation in 1962, the rise of the national boards) to the moral (the loss of the older “West Indian” identity, the lure of franchise cricket). The 1995, 1996, and 1999 World Cup semi-final losses to Australia, the 2003 group-stage exit, the 2014 abandonment of the Indian tour by the West Indian Players’ Association over a pay dispute, and the 2016 T20 World Cup victory under Darren Sammy together chart the curve.

Jack Williams and the Modern Historiography

Williams’s Cricket and Race (2001) and West Indian Cricket and the World (2019) are the indispensable modern surveys. Williams’s central argument is that the West Indian cricketer, far from being a creature of the imperial game, was its principal critic. The West Indian team of 1960 to 1995, with Sobers, Lloyd, Viv Richards, Richards, and Brian Lara at its centre, was the most successful national cricket team in the world over that period; it was also the team that did most to dismantle the older imperial cricket order, refusing (until forced) to play South Africa, refusing to tour Sri Lanka during the civil war in 1996, and standing down rather than tour Zimbabwe in 2003. The game the West Indians played was the imperial game; the politics they made with it was anti-imperial.

Historiographical Note

The historiography of West Indian cricket was, until 1963, written either by the imperial clubs (the MCC histories) or by West Indian memoirists working in a colonial register (C. L. R. James’s own pre-1963 cricket writing falls in this category). James’s Beyond a Boundary (1963) opened the field; Hilary Beckles and Brian Stoddart developed the social-history approach in the 1980s and 1990s; Jack Williams’s Cricket and Race (2001) and West Indian Cricket and the World (2019) brought the historiography into the post-colonial period. The unresolved question is the same one James posed: whether West Indian cricket is best read as a West Indian achievement, an imperial inheritance, or — as Williams argues — both at once.

In this Section

Other Sections