The Spread of the English Language Globally

English is the most successful lingua franca in human history. Somewhere between 1.5 and 2 billion people now use it as a first or second language, and it is the dominant language of international business, science, computing, diplomacy, and civil aviation. Its present position is the joint product of two quite different imperial systems: the British Empire, which between the seventeenth and twentieth centuries carried the language to every inhabited continent, and the post-1945 economic and cultural hegemony of the United States, which consolidated that position in the twentieth century. To talk about the future of English is, in effect, to talk about the inheritance of those two empires — and the question of how far the inheritance is a gift and how far a loss is the most contentious in the field.

The Imperial Distribution of English

The English language was carried abroad in three distinct waves. The first was the seventeenth- and eighteenth-century settlement of the eastern seaboard of North America, the Caribbean plantation colonies, and the early outposts of the East India Company. The second was the late-eighteenth- and nineteenth-century settlement of Australia (1788), New Zealand (1840), the Cape Colony and Natal, and the British North American frontier. The third, and demographically most significant, was the nineteenth-century British takeover of India, the conquest of West and East Africa, the occupation of Egypt, the annexation of Burma and Malaya, and the construction of the colonial administration in Hong Kong, Singapore, and the treaty ports of China.

By 1900, English was the language of administration, higher education, and the higher courts across roughly a quarter of the world’s land surface. The proportion of the population that actually spoke English in the colonial period was, however, very small outside the settler dominions. In India, perhaps 1 per cent of the population was functionally literate in English at independence in 1947. In British West Africa, the comparable figure was around 0.5 per cent. The English-language empire was, in this respect, an empire of small educated classes, and the legacy it left was a legacy of stratification as much as of communication.

Macaulay’s Minute and the Making of Indian English

The most consequential English-language decision of the imperial period was T. B. Macaulay’s 2 February 1835 Minute upon Indian Education. The famous passage is worth quoting in full: “We must at present do our best to form a class who may be interpreters between us and the millions whom we govern; a class of persons, Indian in blood and colour, but English in tastes, in opinions, in morals, and in intellect.” Macaulay’s minute, drafted to settle a quarrel between the Orientalists and the Anglicists, committed the East India Company to the English-language education of an Indian elite. The result was the English-language school and university system that, in slightly modified form, still educates the Indian middle class.

The Indian response to the English-language inheritance has been, in turn, one of the great linguistic achievements of the twentieth century. Indian English, with its distinctive syntax and lexicon, was recognised as a variety in its own right by the Oxford dictionary in 2017. Braj Kachru’s influential model of “World Englishes” (1985) treats Indian English, Nigerian English, Singaporean English, and other postcolonial varieties as a legitimate third circle of the language, alongside the “inner circle” of native Englishes and the “outer circle” of second-language Englishes.

English in Africa

In sub-Saharan Africa, English was introduced as the language of colonial administration in the Gold Coast, Nigeria, Sierra Leone, the Gambia, Kenya, Uganda, Tanganyika, Nyasaland, Northern and Southern Rhodesia, and the four provinces of South Africa. After independence, the language was retained as the official language by most former British colonies, often alongside African languages and sometimes alongside a French or Portuguese colonial inheritance. The result has been the development of distinct national varieties — Ghanaian English, Nigerian English, Kenyan English — which are now recognised by their own dictionaries and by the varieties-of-English sub-field of linguistics.

South Africa is a particularly interesting case. The 1996 constitution, drafted under the post-apartheid settlement, recognises eleven official languages, of which English is one, and gives it an effective primacy in business, the law, and the higher courts — a position it shares, uneasily, with Afrikaans. The historian S. M. Molefe has argued that the post-apartheid promotion of English, in preference to indigenous African languages, has reproduced a colonial hierarchy in new form; the linguist Arthur K. Spears has shown, more sympathetically, that English in South Africa became, against the intentions of its colonial originators, a language of liberation.

The American Inheritance

The twentieth century transformed the position of English in two ways. First, the economic rise of the United States — and especially the technological and cultural dominance of Hollywood, the recording industry, and (after 1980) Silicon Valley — made American English the prestige variety of the language in almost every domain. Second, the United States became, after 1945, the principal global power, and English was institutionalised as the working language of the United Nations, the World Bank, the IMF, NATO, the OECD, and most international scientific bodies. The British Council (founded 1934) and the BBC World Service (English-language broadcasting since 1932) complemented, rather than competed with, the American effort, particularly in the former colonial world.

The combined British-American inheritance is, in David Crystal’s phrase, “a global language” — but the inheritance is not without its critics. Robert Phillipson’s 1992 Linguistic Imperialism argued that the global promotion of English by the British Council, the BBC, and the American agencies was a form of cultural-economic domination; Alastair Pennycook’s The Cultural Politics of English as an International Language (1994) extended the argument to the ELT industry. The controversy continues, although it has been somewhat blunted by the rise of Mandarin Chinese as a credible second global language and by the growing prestige of regional lingua francas such as Swahili in East Africa and Indonesian in Southeast Asia.

The Digital Age and the Future

The development of the internet, the dominance of American and English-language technology companies, and the globalisation of media have further reinforced the position of English. The dominant programming languages (C, C++, Java, Python, JavaScript) are all in English; the operating systems, the protocols, and the World Wide Web itself (proposed by Tim Berners-Lee at CERN in 1989) are all in English. Whether this digital inheritance will be permanent is, however, an open question. The Chinese internet is increasingly conducted in Chinese; the development of large-language-model AI has accelerated the production of high-quality machine translation into all major languages; and the demographic weight of Anglophone populations is, in relative terms, falling.

The most plausible forecast is that the world of the mid-twenty-first century will be bilingual at the global level (English plus Mandarin) and polyglot at the regional level, with English retaining its current institutional primacy in business, science, and the higher courts for at least another generation. That is a long time, and it is also, if one takes the longer historical view, an astonishingly short time — the period in which English has been a global language is, after all, only about a century.

Historiographical Note

The historiography of global English has been transformed, since the 1980s, by the work of Braj Kachru, Yamuna Kachru, and the World Englishes school. The earlier debate — between celebrants such as Crystal and critics such as Phillipson and Pennycook — has largely given way to more empirical work on the local histories of the language in particular settings. The unresolved question in the field is whether English is best understood as a neutral vehicle of communication (Crystal’s position) or as a carrier of the cultural and economic inheritance of the British and American empires (Phillipson’s position). The honest answer is probably that it is both, and that the categories of “neutral” and “non-neutral” are themselves the inheritance of a long twentieth-century argument about language, culture, and power.

In this Section

Other Sections