The Loss of the Thirteen Colonies: A Comprehensive Account

The loss of the thirteen American colonies was the first great territorial loss of the British Empire, and it had profound consequences for the subsequent development of the empire as a whole. The American Revolution, fought from 1775 to 1783, established the United States of America as an independent state and forced the British government to reconsider its imperial strategy. The war cost Britain heavily — in blood, in money, and in political prestige — and it exposed the limits of parliamentary sovereignty over distant colonies with their own representative institutions.

The British failure in America, in the judgment of the historian John Brewer, was the consequence of a state that had become “fiscal-military” in its operations but not in its intelligence. The British Army was the most professional in Europe; the British state was the most expensive. What it lacked, in 1775, was a way of thinking about an empire that included settler colonies with their own representative institutions. That gap, more than any single tactical mistake, was what lost the thirteen colonies.

The British Imperial System in North America

The British imperial system in North America was characterised by the Navigation Acts, the Board of Trade, and the various royal and proprietary governors. The Navigation Acts, first enacted in 1651 and reinforced by acts of 1660, 1663, and 1696, attempted to ensure that colonial commodities reached Britain before being re-exported to other countries, and to give British ships a monopoly of trade with the colonies. The system was enforced by the customs service, by the royal navy in American waters, and by the vice-admiralty courts, which tried offenders without juries. The Board of Trade, established in 1696, supervised the administration of the colonies and reported to the Privy Council. The companion article on the Navigation Acts and Mercantilism examines the trade framework.

The system worked, in the main, by being only partly enforced. As the historian Ian Christie and the late Jack P. Greene have shown, the period between 1700 and 1763 was one of “salutary neglect” — the deliberate, if unspoken, decision not to enforce the commercial regulations on a population that would have been difficult to suppress. The decision to enforce them, after 1763, was what produced the crisis.

The Causes of the Revolution

The American Revolution had multiple causes, including the British attempts to tax the colonies after the Seven Years’ War, the lack of colonial representation in Parliament, the British military presence in North America, and the ideological appeal of republican ideas. The Sugar Act of 1764, the first major post-war measure, imposed new duties on sugar and molasses imported into the colonies. The Stamp Act of 1765 imposed a stamp duty on a range of colonial transactions, and was widely opposed. Its repeal in 1766 was accompanied by the Declaratory Act, asserting the supremacy of Parliament. The Townshend Acts of 1767 imposed duties on glass, lead, paint, paper, and tea imported into the colonies, and produced renewed resistance, including the Boston Massacre of 5 March 1770.

The Boston Tea Party and the Intolerable Acts

The Boston Tea Party of 16 December 1773, in which colonists disguised as Mohawk Indians dumped 342 chests of tea into Boston harbour, was the most famous single act of colonial resistance. The British government responded with the Coercive Acts of 1774 — known in the colonies as the Intolerable Acts — which closed the port of Boston, revised the Massachusetts charter, and provided for the quartering of British troops in colonial buildings. The Quebec Act of 1774, although not one of the Coercive Acts, was included in the list of “Intolerable Acts” by the First Continental Congress in 1774. The First Continental Congress met in Philadelphia from 5 September to 26 October 1774, and adopted a declaration of rights and an association banning trade with Britain.

The Outbreak of Hostilities

The American Revolutionary War began with the battles of Lexington and Concord on 19 April 1775. The British force dispatched from Boston to seize colonial military supplies at Concord was met by Massachusetts militiamen, and the expedition suffered heavy losses on the march back. The Second Continental Congress convened in Philadelphia on 10 May 1775, and on 14 June 1775 it voted to create a Continental Army under the command of George Washington. The Battle of Bunker Hill, on 17 June 1775, was a costly British victory that demonstrated the difficulty of defeating the colonial forces.

The Declaration of Independence and the Military Campaigns

The Declaration of Independence, drafted principally by Thomas Jefferson and adopted on 4 July 1776, was the formal statement of the American colonies’ intention to separate from Britain. The war was fought in three principal theatres: the Northern Campaign of 1776–1777, the Middle States Campaign of 1777–1778, and the Southern Campaign of 1778–1781. The turning point was the British surrender at Saratoga on 17 October 1777, which persuaded France to enter the war as an American ally in February 1778. Spain entered the war in 1779, and the Netherlands in 1780, and the conflict expanded into a global war that put enormous strain on the British navy and the British economy.

The Siege of Yorktown and the End of the War

The siege of Yorktown, fought from 28 September to 19 October 1781, was the decisive engagement of the American Revolutionary War. A British army under General Cornwallis, surrounded by American and French forces and cut off from relief by the French fleet at the Battle of the Chesapeake, was forced to surrender. The preliminary peace of November 1782 led to the Treaty of Paris of 3 September 1783, in which Britain recognised the independence of the United States and agreed to the boundaries of the new republic, which extended west to the Mississippi River and north to the Great Lakes. The British retained Canada, Nova Scotia, Newfoundland, and the rights of the Hudson’s Bay Company, but lost the trans-Appalachian west. As the contemporary British officer John André, captured and hanged as a spy in 1780, had foreseen: “we have but to look at America to see the fate of England.”

The Consequences of the Loss

The loss of the thirteen colonies had profound consequences for the British Empire. The financial cost of the war was heavy: the British national debt grew from about £130 million in 1775 to more than £230 million in 1783, and the burden of taxation in Britain was severe. The political consequences were also significant: the fall of Lord North in March 1782, followed by the brief Whig governments of Lord Rockingham and the Earl of Shelburne, marked the end of an era, and the accession of William Pitt the Younger in December 1783 inaugurated a long period of Tory government. The loss of America forced a basic rethinking of British imperial strategy, and the result was the development of the Second British Empire, with its focus on India, the Caribbean, and the Pacific.

Historiographical Note

The historiography of the loss of the thirteen colonies is dominated by American historians, but the British side has been comprehensively revisited in recent decades. The older Whig accounts, represented by the writing of George Otto Trevelyan in the late nineteenth century, treated the British defeat as the consequence of ministerial incompetence. The Namierite revision in the 1950s, led by Sir Lewis Namier’s work on George III, treated it as the consequence of royal intransigence. The post-revisionist literature of the last forty years — exemplified in the writing of John Brewer, Andrew O’Shaughnessy, and Maya Jasanoff — has produced a more structural account, in which the British defeat is read as the consequence of imperial overstretch and the political exhaustion of the fiscal-military state. The current debate, exemplified in the recent work of Eliga Gould and the contributors to the Oxford History of the British Empire, is over how far the American Revolution should be read as a British failure and how far it should be treated as a moment in a longer imperial reorientation.

In this Section

Other Sections